Newsflash

Drug Stents

Heart bypasses beat drug stents in study

By Ben Hirschler

MUNICH (Reuters) - Patients with difficult-to-treat clogged arteries are better off getting bypass surgery rather than drug stents, according to results of a major clinical study on Monday.

Both procedures proved equally safe but those patients receiving Boston Scientific's drug-coated Taxus stent were more likely to need a repeat procedure, researchers said.

The keenly awaited results of the so-called SYNTAX study by Dutch researchers were presented at the annual meeting of the European Society of Cardiology.

"Despite the advent of drug-eluting stents, surgery comes out a winner," Douglas Weaver, president of the American College of Cardiology, said after the results were presented.

The one-year study found that 17.8 percent of patients receiving stents -- tiny wire-mesh tubes used to prop open clogged heart arteries -- either died, suffered a heart attack, had a stroke or needed a repeat procedure.

The figure was 12.1 percent for those undergoing surgery and receiving coronary artery bypass grafting, known as CABG.

Stenting was introduced in the 1990s and allows doctors to treat patients by inserting a catheter into the groin, resulting in very quick recovery times. CABG requires open-heart surgery.

Doctors in Munich said the results would be studied carefully but might not lead to a dramatic change in practice since many of the patients in the Dutch study would probably have received surgery anyway in normal clinical practice.

A more favorable result for stenting, however, could have encouraged further use of stenting over CABG.

Keith Dawkins, Associate Chief Medical Officer at Boston Scientific, said he believed the study was reassuring for the use of stents, despite not achieving its goal.

"The primary endpoint was missed. But it wasn't missed because of safety concerns; it was missed due to revascularization (reopening of arteries)," he said.


© Thomson Reuters 2008 All rights reserved

 
powered_by.png, 1 kB

Latest News

Popular


Home arrow Stent Information
Stent Information

Status of Cardiac Stents Focus of NEJM Article

17 Nov 2006

Drug-coated stent or bare-metal stent? The question of which device is the best for opening blocked coronary arteries is addressed by a University at Buffalo physician in the current issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

Miriam Shuchman, M.D., a physician-journalist and UB clinical assistant professor of psychiatry, is author of the "Perspective" article, which reviews findings from the FDA, industry and several academic investigators in advance of a meeting called by the FDA in early December to discuss the topic.

The issue has gained significant attention recently as studies, including those conducted by manufacturers, have shown that although drug-coated, also referred to as drug-eluting, metal-mesh devices prevent arterial wall tissue from growing through the mesh and reclogging the artery, patients with these stents are more likely to develop more troublesome blockages inside the device.

The Circulatory System Devices Advisory Panel meeting in December is to be attended by physicians, scientists and representatives from Boston Scientific and Johnson and Johnson, the two leaders (and rivals) in a stent industry estimated at $5.5 billion.

In the article, Shuchman discusses several reports presented by researchers at the World Cardiology Congress in Barcelona in September that showed increases in deaths and heart attacks among recipients of drug-eluting stents compared to patients who received bare stents. Further data presented at a symposium in October in Washington, D.C., showed a risk of blockages occurring one year after patients received the drug-coated stents.

"These data challenge the golden reputation of drug-eluting stents," says Shuchman in the article. "The devices have reduced the need for both emergency cardiac surgery and additional angioplasty, they are associated with substantially lower restenosis rates at six months than are bare-metal stents and successful outcomes are visible on angioplasty."

However, she notes that some cardiologists feel "blindsided" by the new morbidity and mortality findings. Manufacturers counter that problems with drug-eluting stents remain very low, even though adverse events are slightly higher than initially believed.
The current findings regarding drug-eluting stents may stem to some degree from their wide off-label use, says Shuchman. "The FDA approved drug-eluting stents for single blockages involving short lesions in small vessels, but they are used routinely for longer lesions, in larger vessels and for multiple lesions.

"Drug eluting stents are used in more than 90 percent of angioplasty procedures, but that's changing due to the new findings," she says. "Their use has dropped slightly while physicians wait to see what the FDA will do."

(Source: New England Journal of Medicine : University at Buffalo: November 2006.)
 

© 2009 Drug Coated Heart Stent
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.